{
  "scene_id": "scenesmith-example-data_scene_064",
  "source_method": "scenesmith",
  "task_instruction": "A kitchen featuring a bistro table with two chairs in a corner and a refrigerator positioned nearby.",
  "config_path": "/data/250010098/SceneBenchmark/src/config/vlm_critic.yaml",
  "dry_run": false,
  "results": [
    {
      "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_dining_chair_0",
      "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
      "label": "unknown",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.67,
      "evidence_conflict": true,
      "reason": "In the local render and the highlighted local_context render, kitchen_dining_chair_0 appears tipped/rotated onto its side and interpenetrating the nearby bistro table base rather than standing as a normal usable chair. The overview renders show the same abnormal pose in the corner. This directly conflicts with the converter-side asset fact that the subject remains a sittable chair with a usable seating edge, so I cannot reliably judge a normal walk-up seating approach for the intended affordance from the current evidence without guessing the functional state of the object itself.",
      "blocking_objects": [],
      "confidence": 0.93
    },
    {
      "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_dining_chair_0",
      "metric": "interaction_clearance",
      "label": "fail",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.67,
      "evidence_conflict": false,
      "reason": "In the local render and the highlighted local_context render, kitchen_dining_chair_0 is visibly entangled with the nearby bistro table base/pedestal and pressed together with kitchen_dining_chair_1, so the normal sit/stand zone at the usable seating side is not open. The overview renders also show this chair pair crammed into the corner beside the table, with no practical free edge for pulling out and sitting down now. This is a direct immediate-clearance failure, not just a loose nearby adjacency in perspective view alone. Note: the table is a visible blocker in the local views, but its object id was not provided in the scene hints, so only the identified chair blocker is listed below by id.",
      "blocking_objects": [
        "kitchen_dining_chair_1"
      ],
      "confidence": 0.92
    },
    {
      "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_dining_chair_1",
      "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
      "label": "fail",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.67,
      "evidence_conflict": false,
      "reason": "In the local render, kitchen_dining_chair_1 is overturned and trapped under/against the nearby bistro table, with the round tabletop/base and table support crossing over the chair’s seating area and approach side. This means there is no normal walk-up corridor to the seat edge and no practical front or side sitting approach. The overview renders also show this furniture cluster jammed into the corner by the walls, confirming the chair is not realistically accessible for sitting now. The direct blocker visible in the local render is the overturned bistro table assembly around the chair, with the corner walls further eliminating alternate approach space around the cluster. This judges only current spatial accessibility, not the chair’s semantic affordance class itself.",
      "blocking_objects": [
        "bistro_table",
        "wall/corner enclosure"
      ],
      "confidence": 0.96
    },
    {
      "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_dining_chair_1",
      "metric": "interaction_clearance",
      "label": "unknown",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.67,
      "evidence_conflict": true,
      "reason": "In the local render, the subject chair appears overturned/on its side and interpenetrated with the nearby round bistro table base rather than standing upright in a normal usable orientation. The overview renders show the same corner arrangement, with the chair and table tangled together. Because this clearly conflicts with the asset fact that the subject is a normally sittable chair with an identifiable sitting side, the immediate sit/stand zone cannot be reliably evaluated from the current scene state, so the interaction_clearance judgment is unknown rather than guessed.",
      "blocking_objects": [],
      "confidence": 0.92
    },
    {
      "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_fridge_0",
      "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
      "label": "pass",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.86,
      "evidence_conflict": false,
      "reason": "Consistency rewrite from fail: the paired openable interaction_clearance check passed for kitchen_fridge_0, so the local evidence supports a usable standing/operating zone. Original spatial_accessibility reason: In the local_plan_context render, the green kitchen prep cart sits directly across the fridge’s front operating side, leaving no normal front-facing standing area at the usable face. The local_operating_zone_context and local_depth_probe renders also show the prep cart tightly abutting the same side of the fridge, so the approach is blocked rather than merely overlapping in perspective. A practical path to stand and open the refrigerator is not available now due to kitchen_kitchen_prep_cart_0 occupying the front approach zone.",
      "blocking_objects": [],
      "confidence": 0.85
    },
    {
      "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_fridge_0",
      "metric": "interaction_clearance",
      "label": "pass",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.69,
      "evidence_conflict": false,
      "reason": "In the local operating zone render and the highlighted local operating zone/context render, the refrigerator’s usable front face is the side facing into the room, and the floor area directly in front of that operating side remains open enough for a practical standing or slightly offset reach position. In the local plan context view, the nearby bistro table and chairs sit off to the side rather than occupying the immediate front operating zone, and no direct floor-level blocker is shown pinching the door/handle area. The overview renders are consistent with this: nearby furniture is adjacent but does not clearly intrude into the refrigerator’s immediate opening/standing space on the front side.",
      "blocking_objects": [],
      "confidence": 0.73
    },
    {
      "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_bistro_table_0__to__kitchen_dining_chair_0__kitchen_dining_chair_1",
      "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
      "label": "unknown",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.67,
      "evidence_conflict": true,
      "reason": "In the local render and the highlighted local_context render, the subject bistro table appears tipped onto its side rather than standing upright, with the round top oriented vertically and the chairs tangled against it. That directly conflicts with the provided asset fact that the table's usable affordance is the supportable top surface, so I cannot reliably judge whether a person can normally approach the room-facing side and reach a usable top surface in the current scene. The overview renders show the same overturned arrangement in the corner, but they do not resolve this asset-fact conflict into a normal accessible tabletop setup.",
      "blocking_objects": [],
      "confidence": 0.88
    },
    {
      "check_id": "affordance_exposure__kitchen_bistro_table_0__to__kitchen_dining_chair_0__kitchen_dining_chair_1",
      "metric": "affordance_exposure",
      "label": "unknown",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.67,
      "evidence_conflict": true,
      "reason": "In the local render and the highlighted local_context render, the subject bistro table’s round top is visually visible, but the table appears tipped onto its side rather than upright. That directly conflicts with the provided asset fact that the usable affordance is the table’s supportable top surface, so I cannot reliably judge the intended top-surface exposure as a normal usable support surface from this evidence alone; returning unknown due to the asset-fact conflict rather than a visibility blocker.",
      "blocking_objects": [],
      "confidence": 0.88
    },
    {
      "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0",
      "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
      "label": "fail",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.87,
      "evidence_conflict": false,
      "reason": "In the local operating zone render and the highlighted local operating zone context view, the subject cabinet run’s usable front side is immediately faced by an adjacent blue cabinet run/island cabinet, leaving only a very tight slit rather than a normal standing approach. The local depth probe and especially the local plan context view confirm that this blue cabinet spans most of the operating side directly in front of the red-highlighted subject, so there is no practical front-facing or slightly offset position from which to reach and open the cabinet normally now. The overview renders are consistent with this pinched aisle condition rather than showing an alternate accessible front approach along the usable side of the subject cabinet run.",
      "blocking_objects": [
        "adjacent blue cabinet run/island cabinet"
      ],
      "confidence": 0.89
    },
    {
      "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0",
      "metric": "interaction_clearance",
      "label": "fail",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.78,
      "evidence_conflict": false,
      "reason": "In the local operating zone render and the highlighted local operating zone context render, the most likely operating side of kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0 is the long front edge facing into the room, but that side is immediately pinched by an opposing blue cabinet run placed directly in front of it. The local depth probe and especially the local plan context view show this opposing cabinet spanning nearly the full length of the subject’s front, leaving no normal standing/opening zone directly before the doors/handles. This is a direct blockage of the immediate operating space, not just perspective overlap, so the cabinet is not practically openable now from its usable side.",
      "blocking_objects": [
        "opposing blue cabinet run directly in front of kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0"
      ],
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_pepper_shaker_0__to__kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0",
      "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
      "label": "pass",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.58,
      "evidence_conflict": false,
      "reason": "In the local_plan_context render, the red-highlighted shaker sits on the wall shelf with open room-side space directly in front of its usable side; the nearby mug, salt shaker, frame, and plant are adjacent on the shelf but do not occupy the standing/reach zone in front of it. In the overview renders, there is still a practical approach from the room side toward that wall shelf area, and no local view shows the operating side pinched or blocked across its front-facing access region. Therefore at least one normal front or slightly offset reach position remains usable now.",
      "blocking_objects": [],
      "confidence": 0.73
    },
    {
      "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_pepper_shaker_0__to__kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0",
      "metric": "interaction_clearance",
      "label": "pass",
      "asset_fact_used": true,
      "asset_fact_confidence": 0.58,
      "evidence_conflict": false,
      "reason": "In the local operating zone render and the highlighted local operating zone context render, the red subject shaker sits on the wall shelf with its front/usable side exposed and a reachable hand position available from the room side. The nearby mug, salt shaker, and frame are adjacent on the shelf but do not visibly occupy the immediate operating space needed to grasp and open the shaker. The local depth-probe and local plan-context/overview views also do not show any object directly blocking the shelf edge in front of the shaker, so a normal slightly offset hand access position remains usable now.",
      "blocking_objects": [],
      "confidence": 0.74
    }
  ],
  "object_results": [
    {
      "subject_id": "kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0",
      "checks": [
        {
          "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0",
          "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
          "label": "fail",
          "confidence": 0.89,
          "reason": "In the local operating zone render and the highlighted local operating zone context view, the subject cabinet run’s usable front side is immediately faced by an adjacent blue cabinet run/island cabinet, leaving only a very tight slit rather than a normal standing approach. The local depth probe and especially the local plan context view confirm that this blue cabinet spans most of the operating side directly in front of the red-highlighted subject, so there is no practical front-facing or slightly offset position from which to reach and open the cabinet normally now. The overview renders are consistent with this pinched aisle condition rather than showing an alternate accessible front approach along the usable side of the subject cabinet run.",
          "blocking_objects": [
            "adjacent blue cabinet run/island cabinet"
          ],
          "score": 0.0,
          "known": true
        },
        {
          "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0",
          "metric": "interaction_clearance",
          "label": "fail",
          "confidence": 0.9,
          "reason": "In the local operating zone render and the highlighted local operating zone context render, the most likely operating side of kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0 is the long front edge facing into the room, but that side is immediately pinched by an opposing blue cabinet run placed directly in front of it. The local depth probe and especially the local plan context view show this opposing cabinet spanning nearly the full length of the subject’s front, leaving no normal standing/opening zone directly before the doors/handles. This is a direct blockage of the immediate operating space, not just perspective overlap, so the cabinet is not practically openable now from its usable side.",
          "blocking_objects": [
            "opposing blue cabinet run directly in front of kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0"
          ],
          "score": 0.0,
          "known": true
        }
      ],
      "metric_summary": {
        "interaction_clearance": {
          "pass": 0,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 1,
          "unknown": 0,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 1,
          "coverage": 1.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": 0.0,
          "score": 0.0
        },
        "spatial_accessibility": {
          "pass": 0,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 1,
          "unknown": 0,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 1,
          "coverage": 1.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": 0.0,
          "score": 0.0
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "subject_id": "kitchen_bistro_table_0",
      "checks": [
        {
          "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_bistro_table_0__to__kitchen_dining_chair_0__kitchen_dining_chair_1",
          "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
          "label": "unknown",
          "confidence": 0.88,
          "reason": "In the local render and the highlighted local_context render, the subject bistro table appears tipped onto its side rather than standing upright, with the round top oriented vertically and the chairs tangled against it. That directly conflicts with the provided asset fact that the table's usable affordance is the supportable top surface, so I cannot reliably judge whether a person can normally approach the room-facing side and reach a usable top surface in the current scene. The overview renders show the same overturned arrangement in the corner, but they do not resolve this asset-fact conflict into a normal accessible tabletop setup.",
          "blocking_objects": [],
          "score": null,
          "known": false
        },
        {
          "check_id": "affordance_exposure__kitchen_bistro_table_0__to__kitchen_dining_chair_0__kitchen_dining_chair_1",
          "metric": "affordance_exposure",
          "label": "unknown",
          "confidence": 0.88,
          "reason": "In the local render and the highlighted local_context render, the subject bistro table’s round top is visually visible, but the table appears tipped onto its side rather than upright. That directly conflicts with the provided asset fact that the usable affordance is the table’s supportable top surface, so I cannot reliably judge the intended top-surface exposure as a normal usable support surface from this evidence alone; returning unknown due to the asset-fact conflict rather than a visibility blocker.",
          "blocking_objects": [],
          "score": null,
          "known": false
        }
      ],
      "metric_summary": {
        "affordance_exposure": {
          "pass": 0,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 0,
          "unknown": 1,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 0,
          "coverage": 0.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": null,
          "score": null
        },
        "spatial_accessibility": {
          "pass": 0,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 0,
          "unknown": 1,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 0,
          "coverage": 0.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": null,
          "score": null
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "subject_id": "kitchen_dining_chair_0",
      "checks": [
        {
          "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_dining_chair_0",
          "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
          "label": "unknown",
          "confidence": 0.93,
          "reason": "In the local render and the highlighted local_context render, kitchen_dining_chair_0 appears tipped/rotated onto its side and interpenetrating the nearby bistro table base rather than standing as a normal usable chair. The overview renders show the same abnormal pose in the corner. This directly conflicts with the converter-side asset fact that the subject remains a sittable chair with a usable seating edge, so I cannot reliably judge a normal walk-up seating approach for the intended affordance from the current evidence without guessing the functional state of the object itself.",
          "blocking_objects": [],
          "score": null,
          "known": false
        },
        {
          "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_dining_chair_0",
          "metric": "interaction_clearance",
          "label": "fail",
          "confidence": 0.92,
          "reason": "In the local render and the highlighted local_context render, kitchen_dining_chair_0 is visibly entangled with the nearby bistro table base/pedestal and pressed together with kitchen_dining_chair_1, so the normal sit/stand zone at the usable seating side is not open. The overview renders also show this chair pair crammed into the corner beside the table, with no practical free edge for pulling out and sitting down now. This is a direct immediate-clearance failure, not just a loose nearby adjacency in perspective view alone. Note: the table is a visible blocker in the local views, but its object id was not provided in the scene hints, so only the identified chair blocker is listed below by id.",
          "blocking_objects": [
            "kitchen_dining_chair_1"
          ],
          "score": 0.0,
          "known": true
        }
      ],
      "metric_summary": {
        "interaction_clearance": {
          "pass": 0,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 1,
          "unknown": 0,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 1,
          "coverage": 1.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": 0.0,
          "score": 0.0
        },
        "spatial_accessibility": {
          "pass": 0,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 0,
          "unknown": 1,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 0,
          "coverage": 0.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": null,
          "score": null
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "subject_id": "kitchen_dining_chair_1",
      "checks": [
        {
          "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_dining_chair_1",
          "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
          "label": "fail",
          "confidence": 0.96,
          "reason": "In the local render, kitchen_dining_chair_1 is overturned and trapped under/against the nearby bistro table, with the round tabletop/base and table support crossing over the chair’s seating area and approach side. This means there is no normal walk-up corridor to the seat edge and no practical front or side sitting approach. The overview renders also show this furniture cluster jammed into the corner by the walls, confirming the chair is not realistically accessible for sitting now. The direct blocker visible in the local render is the overturned bistro table assembly around the chair, with the corner walls further eliminating alternate approach space around the cluster. This judges only current spatial accessibility, not the chair’s semantic affordance class itself.",
          "blocking_objects": [
            "bistro_table",
            "wall/corner enclosure"
          ],
          "score": 0.0,
          "known": true
        },
        {
          "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_dining_chair_1",
          "metric": "interaction_clearance",
          "label": "unknown",
          "confidence": 0.92,
          "reason": "In the local render, the subject chair appears overturned/on its side and interpenetrated with the nearby round bistro table base rather than standing upright in a normal usable orientation. The overview renders show the same corner arrangement, with the chair and table tangled together. Because this clearly conflicts with the asset fact that the subject is a normally sittable chair with an identifiable sitting side, the immediate sit/stand zone cannot be reliably evaluated from the current scene state, so the interaction_clearance judgment is unknown rather than guessed.",
          "blocking_objects": [],
          "score": null,
          "known": false
        }
      ],
      "metric_summary": {
        "interaction_clearance": {
          "pass": 0,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 0,
          "unknown": 1,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 0,
          "coverage": 0.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": null,
          "score": null
        },
        "spatial_accessibility": {
          "pass": 0,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 1,
          "unknown": 0,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 1,
          "coverage": 1.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": 0.0,
          "score": 0.0
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "subject_id": "kitchen_fridge_0",
      "checks": [
        {
          "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_fridge_0",
          "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
          "label": "pass",
          "confidence": 0.85,
          "reason": "Consistency rewrite from fail: the paired openable interaction_clearance check passed for kitchen_fridge_0, so the local evidence supports a usable standing/operating zone. Original spatial_accessibility reason: In the local_plan_context render, the green kitchen prep cart sits directly across the fridge’s front operating side, leaving no normal front-facing standing area at the usable face. The local_operating_zone_context and local_depth_probe renders also show the prep cart tightly abutting the same side of the fridge, so the approach is blocked rather than merely overlapping in perspective. A practical path to stand and open the refrigerator is not available now due to kitchen_kitchen_prep_cart_0 occupying the front approach zone.",
          "blocking_objects": [],
          "score": 1.0,
          "known": true
        },
        {
          "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_fridge_0",
          "metric": "interaction_clearance",
          "label": "pass",
          "confidence": 0.73,
          "reason": "In the local operating zone render and the highlighted local operating zone/context render, the refrigerator’s usable front face is the side facing into the room, and the floor area directly in front of that operating side remains open enough for a practical standing or slightly offset reach position. In the local plan context view, the nearby bistro table and chairs sit off to the side rather than occupying the immediate front operating zone, and no direct floor-level blocker is shown pinching the door/handle area. The overview renders are consistent with this: nearby furniture is adjacent but does not clearly intrude into the refrigerator’s immediate opening/standing space on the front side.",
          "blocking_objects": [],
          "score": 1.0,
          "known": true
        }
      ],
      "metric_summary": {
        "interaction_clearance": {
          "pass": 1,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 0,
          "unknown": 0,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 1,
          "coverage": 1.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": 1.0,
          "score": 1.0
        },
        "spatial_accessibility": {
          "pass": 1,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 0,
          "unknown": 0,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 1,
          "coverage": 1.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": 1.0,
          "score": 1.0
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "subject_id": "kitchen_pepper_shaker_0",
      "checks": [
        {
          "check_id": "spatial_accessibility__kitchen_pepper_shaker_0__to__kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0",
          "metric": "spatial_accessibility",
          "label": "pass",
          "confidence": 0.73,
          "reason": "In the local_plan_context render, the red-highlighted shaker sits on the wall shelf with open room-side space directly in front of its usable side; the nearby mug, salt shaker, frame, and plant are adjacent on the shelf but do not occupy the standing/reach zone in front of it. In the overview renders, there is still a practical approach from the room side toward that wall shelf area, and no local view shows the operating side pinched or blocked across its front-facing access region. Therefore at least one normal front or slightly offset reach position remains usable now.",
          "blocking_objects": [],
          "score": 1.0,
          "known": true
        },
        {
          "check_id": "interaction_clearance__kitchen_pepper_shaker_0__to__kitchen_base_cabinet_run_0",
          "metric": "interaction_clearance",
          "label": "pass",
          "confidence": 0.74,
          "reason": "In the local operating zone render and the highlighted local operating zone context render, the red subject shaker sits on the wall shelf with its front/usable side exposed and a reachable hand position available from the room side. The nearby mug, salt shaker, and frame are adjacent on the shelf but do not visibly occupy the immediate operating space needed to grasp and open the shaker. The local depth-probe and local plan-context/overview views also do not show any object directly blocking the shelf edge in front of the shaker, so a normal slightly offset hand access position remains usable now.",
          "blocking_objects": [],
          "score": 1.0,
          "known": true
        }
      ],
      "metric_summary": {
        "interaction_clearance": {
          "pass": 1,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 0,
          "unknown": 0,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 1,
          "coverage": 1.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": 1.0,
          "score": 1.0
        },
        "spatial_accessibility": {
          "pass": 1,
          "degraded": 0,
          "fail": 0,
          "unknown": 0,
          "total_checks": 1,
          "effective_checks": 1,
          "coverage": 1.0,
          "effective_pass_rate": 1.0,
          "score": 1.0
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "metric_summary": {
    "affordance_exposure": {
      "pass": 0,
      "degraded": 0,
      "fail": 0,
      "unknown": 1,
      "total_checks": 1,
      "effective_checks": 0,
      "coverage": 0.0,
      "effective_pass_rate": null,
      "score": null
    },
    "interaction_clearance": {
      "pass": 2,
      "degraded": 0,
      "fail": 2,
      "unknown": 1,
      "total_checks": 5,
      "effective_checks": 4,
      "coverage": 0.8,
      "effective_pass_rate": 0.5,
      "score": 0.5
    },
    "spatial_accessibility": {
      "pass": 2,
      "degraded": 0,
      "fail": 2,
      "unknown": 2,
      "total_checks": 6,
      "effective_checks": 4,
      "coverage": 0.6666666666666666,
      "effective_pass_rate": 0.5,
      "score": 0.5
    }
  },
  "scene_summary": {
    "pass": 4,
    "degraded": 0,
    "fail": 4,
    "unknown": 4,
    "total_checks": 12,
    "effective_checks": 8,
    "coverage": 0.6666666666666666,
    "effective_pass_rate": 0.5,
    "score": 0.5
  }
}